Enterprise meeting intelligence

Where is AI actually processing your
confidential meetings?

Sitr gives employees AI meeting summaries, decision visibility, and searchable meeting knowledge—while capture and transcription stay on the device and analysis runs on infrastructure your organization controls.

Built for organizations that need useful meeting intelligence without sending confidential conversations to vendor-operated cloud processing by default.

Meeting
Your infrastructure AI analysis runs here
Summaries & insights
Local capture. Organization-operated analysis.

What Sitr delivers

Meeting intelligence employees and leaders can use—without waiting through a long infrastructure debate to understand the product.

AI meeting summaries

Long conversations become structured summaries employees can review after the meeting—not scattered notes across tools.

Decision visibility

Teams see what was decided, debated, or deferred—without relying on memory or incomplete recaps.

Clearer follow-ups

Action items and next steps are easier to track when the meeting output is structured and easy to revisit.

Searchable meeting knowledge

Past meetings remain findable in the desktop workspace—so institutional knowledge does not disappear when people change roles or leave.

Why meeting data is sensitive

Strategy, commercial terms, personnel matters, unreleased plans, and legal advice often exist in conversations long before they enter any system of record. When AI joins those meetings, processing location matters.

Board and leadership

Direction, risk, performance, and unresolved decisions.

Financial planning

Budgets, forecasts, pricing, and investment priorities.

People and HR

Hiring, performance, organizational change, and employee matters.

Customer negotiations

Commercial terms, objections, commitments, and account strategy.

Product and R&D

Roadmaps, technical choices, experiments, and intellectual property.

Legal discussions

Advice, disputes, contracts, and regulatory considerations.

The architectural difference

Vendor-operated processing optimizes for convenience. Sitr is built for organizations that prioritize control over where confidential meeting content is processed.

Vendor-operated processing
Your organization
Meeting
Vendor-operated cloud
Provider-operated processing
Organization-operated processing
Your organization
Meeting
Your processing server
Where AI processes meeting content
Vendor-operated processing

Meeting content processed in infrastructure operated by the provider.

Faster adoption and less internal setup. A practical choice when processing location is not a first-order requirement.

Organization-operated processing

AI meeting intelligence runs on infrastructure your organization operates.

Meeting capture stays on the employee’s device. AI analysis runs on processing infrastructure your team selects and operates.

Often selected when
  • Governance or client obligations require control over processing location
  • Internal policy applies to confidential meeting content
  • Privacy-sensitive or regulated environments need a known, accountable boundary

How Sitr works

A straightforward deployment choice—not a major infrastructure project.

01

Capture locally

Employees join Zoom, Teams, Meet, or other calls as usual. Sitr captures from the desktop—it does not join as a meeting bot.

02

Transcribe locally

Meeting audio is transcribed on the employee’s device. Sensitive audio is not uploaded to a vendor cloud for processing.

03

Process on your infrastructure

Your organization runs the Sitr processing service on infrastructure it controls. AI analysis happens there—not on vendor-operated servers.

04

Receive summaries and insights

Structured summaries, decision visibility, and follow-up clarity return to the user in the desktop workspace.

Control without losing product value

Choosing where AI processes confidential meetings does not mean giving up useful meeting intelligence. Sitr delivers summaries, searchable knowledge, and clearer follow-ups on infrastructure your organization operates.

For teams that need both governance and productivity, the question is not whether AI belongs in meetings—it is whether processing location is a deliberate decision.

Technical evidence

For security, IT, and architecture reviewers who need detail beyond the overview.

Available online

Security and Architecture

Where audio and transcript data are processed and how desktop, Portal, and processing-server boundaries divide responsibility.

Review security
Available online

Product Workflow

How employees capture meetings, follow local transcription, and receive analysis from your processing infrastructure.

Review product
Available online

Deployment

Compare vendor-operated and organization-operated processing across governance and operating trade-offs.

Review deployment
Available online

Pilot

The core questions a pilot should answer—workflow, output, architecture, and operating fit.

Review pilot

Evaluate Sitr for your organization

If processing location is part of your buying decision, Sitr is worth a structured evaluation.