Product workflow

What would employees actually use?

A Windows desktop workflow for recording meetings, following a live local transcript, and reviewing AI-generated summaries.

Does it require a meeting bot or a new conferencing platform?

Users join their meetings normally, then record from Wislab Desktop.

Wislab captures microphone audio on the user’s Windows device and can include meeting-output audio when system loopback capture is available. It does not join the call as a participant, and it does not replace Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Webex, or another meeting application.

1

Choose a meeting

Start an ad-hoc recording or select an upcoming Google or Microsoft calendar meeting shown in the desktop application.

2

Confirm participant notice

The recording flow reminds the user to notify meeting participants before capture begins.

3

Record from the desktop overlay

The compact recording window shows capture status, elapsed time, and the developing transcript.

4

Finish or discard

Finishing saves the local recording and transcript. Discarding removes the in-progress capture without creating a meeting record.

Current scope

The packaged desktop application is currently built for Windows. macOS and Linux desktop applications are not presented as available products.

Where does speech become text?

Transcription runs locally while the meeting is being recorded.

A speech model on the user’s device processes captured audio and updates the live transcript. When recording ends, the transcript is finalized and stored in the desktop database alongside the local recording.

During

Live transcript

Recent transcript segments appear in the recording overlay so the user can confirm that transcription is progressing.

Processing occurs on the desktop.
After

Saved transcript

The completed transcript includes timed text segments and can be reviewed or exported from the meeting detail view.

Stored with the local meeting record.
Accuracy

Transcription quality depends on audio quality, speaker clarity, device resources, and the local speech model. A pilot should test representative meeting conditions rather than assume uniform accuracy.

What does the AI produce, and where is it produced?

The configured processing server turns transcript text into a structured meeting summary.

After local transcription finishes, the desktop sends transcript text to the processing server your organization operates. The server generates the result and returns it to the desktop.

Summary

A condensed account of the discussion, organized into readable sections.

Section-based format

The summary uses fixed sections so reviewers can scan overview, decisions, and key topics in a consistent layout.

Decision-oriented output

Decisions can be identified when the transcript contains a clear decision.

Copy and export

Users can copy summary text or export the summary and transcript from the desktop.

Sent to the processing server
Transcript text, optional timing segments, and meeting identifiers used by the workflow
Not sent by the summary endpoint
The meeting audio file
Returned to the desktop
Job status and the completed structured summary
Stored locally
Recording metadata, transcript, summary, and the local audio file path

How do users return to a meeting after it ends?

Recordings, transcripts, and summaries are organized in the desktop workspace.

Users can open a past meeting, switch between summary and transcript views, rename or delete the meeting, copy the summary, and export available outputs.

1

Find the meeting

Browse the meeting list or search by meeting title.

2

Review the result

Open the summary or the timed transcript in the meeting detail view.

3

Use the output

Copy summary text or export a transcript or summary file.

4

Manage local history

Rename a record or delete its local audio, transcript, and summary.

Search scope

The current desktop search filters meetings by title. The site does not claim semantic search, organization-wide knowledge retrieval, or transcript-content search.

What components would our team need to operate?

Three components have distinct responsibilities.

The desktop handles capture and local transcription. The Portal handles user sign-in. The processing server handles summary generation and optional collaboration workflows.

User device

Wislab Desktop

  • Windows meeting capture
  • Live local transcription
  • Local audio and meeting history
  • Calendar meeting display
Wislab-operated

Account Portal

  • Browser-based sign-in
  • Desktop access and refresh tokens
  • Portal account services
Organization-operated

Processing server

  • Authenticated transcript intake
  • Summary job processing
  • Session and consent data when enabled
  • Server-side job storage

What should we not assume is included?

Current product scope, stated plainly.

A credible evaluation needs clear boundaries. These are capabilities the website does not present as part of the current product.

No meeting bot

The product records from the desktop; it does not join calls as an automated participant.

No macOS or Linux desktop release

The current packaged desktop product and installer are for Windows.

No claimed enterprise RBAC

The website does not promise organization-wide roles or granular meeting permissions that are not implemented.

No semantic knowledge platform claim

The current library supports local meeting history and title search, not a company-wide semantic search service.

No automatic task-system integration

Automatic synchronization to external task tools is not claimed.

No Wislab-hosted inference claim

The current deployment model requires a processing server configured and operated for the organization.

Would this workflow fit a representative team?

A pilot can test capture, local transcription, summary quality, server operations, and user adoption with real meeting conditions.