Live transcript
Recent transcript segments appear in the recording overlay so the user can confirm that transcription is progressing.
Processing occurs on the desktop.A Windows desktop workflow for recording meetings, following a live local transcript, and reviewing AI-generated summaries.
Does it require a meeting bot or a new conferencing platform?
Wislab captures microphone audio on the user’s Windows device and can include meeting-output audio when system loopback capture is available. It does not join the call as a participant, and it does not replace Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Webex, or another meeting application.
Start an ad-hoc recording or select an upcoming Google or Microsoft calendar meeting shown in the desktop application.
The recording flow reminds the user to notify meeting participants before capture begins.
The compact recording window shows capture status, elapsed time, and the developing transcript.
Finishing saves the local recording and transcript. Discarding removes the in-progress capture without creating a meeting record.
The packaged desktop application is currently built for Windows. macOS and Linux desktop applications are not presented as available products.
Where does speech become text?
A speech model on the user’s device processes captured audio and updates the live transcript. When recording ends, the transcript is finalized and stored in the desktop database alongside the local recording.
Recent transcript segments appear in the recording overlay so the user can confirm that transcription is progressing.
Processing occurs on the desktop.The completed transcript includes timed text segments and can be reviewed or exported from the meeting detail view.
Stored with the local meeting record.Transcription quality depends on audio quality, speaker clarity, device resources, and the local speech model. A pilot should test representative meeting conditions rather than assume uniform accuracy.
What does the AI produce, and where is it produced?
After local transcription finishes, the desktop sends transcript text to the processing server your organization operates. The server generates the result and returns it to the desktop.
A condensed account of the discussion, organized into readable sections.
The summary uses fixed sections so reviewers can scan overview, decisions, and key topics in a consistent layout.
Decisions can be identified when the transcript contains a clear decision.
Users can copy summary text or export the summary and transcript from the desktop.
How do users return to a meeting after it ends?
Users can open a past meeting, switch between summary and transcript views, rename or delete the meeting, copy the summary, and export available outputs.
Browse the meeting list or search by meeting title.
Open the summary or the timed transcript in the meeting detail view.
Copy summary text or export a transcript or summary file.
Rename a record or delete its local audio, transcript, and summary.
The current desktop search filters meetings by title. The site does not claim semantic search, organization-wide knowledge retrieval, or transcript-content search.
What components would our team need to operate?
The desktop handles capture and local transcription. The Portal handles user sign-in. The processing server handles summary generation and optional collaboration workflows.
What should we not assume is included?
A credible evaluation needs clear boundaries. These are capabilities the website does not present as part of the current product.
The product records from the desktop; it does not join calls as an automated participant.
The current packaged desktop product and installer are for Windows.
The website does not promise organization-wide roles or granular meeting permissions that are not implemented.
The current library supports local meeting history and title search, not a company-wide semantic search service.
Automatic synchronization to external task tools is not claimed.
The current deployment model requires a processing server configured and operated for the organization.
A pilot can test capture, local transcription, summary quality, server operations, and user adoption with real meeting conditions.